简单测评UCloud上海机房ARM架构快杰云服务器,1核1G内存1M带宽40G RSSD云盘年付580元(2G内存有活动52元/年)

前文《UCloud年终特惠新增快杰O型ARM云服务器,上海可用区,2核4G低至年107元,比AMD更便宜!》,我们说到UCloud年终特惠活动新增了上海机房ARM架构快杰云服务器,活动上架的最低配置是1核2G内存1M带宽40G RSSD云盘,年付价格只要52元起。

今天休息,老刘测评网选购了一台UCloud控制台最低配的上海机房ARM架构快杰云服务器:1核1G内存1M带宽40G RSSD云盘(40G RSSD云盘以内是商家免费送的,下单时直接从20G加到40G即可),进行了简单测评,这款配置目前没有活动,是年付580元,不过最低配性能算是可以兜底的,大家觉得这个配置性能不错的话,高些的配置肯定更好!

UCloud快杰O型ARM云服务器促销活动地址:https://www.ucloud.cn/site/active/kuaijie.html#shanghai,可用区:上海二A。

以下是老刘博客简单测评UCloud上海机房ARM架构快杰云服务器(1核1G内存1M带宽40G RSSD云盘)结果,抛图如下,为确保中立性,这里不作文字阐述,大家自行解读即可。鉴于是国内机器,路由追踪,流媒体解析,以及世界各个洲的上传下载等性能就没必要测了,机器也不适合应该在外贸等场景。

UCloud上海机房ARM架构快杰云服务器配置信息:

特别提醒,看下图,这款机器操作系统目前只能选择Centos 8.2 aarch64位和Ubuntu 20.04 aarch64位。

UCloud上海机房ARM架构快杰云服务器三网Ping测试:

UCloud上海机房ARM架构快杰云服务器丢包率测试:

UCloud上海机房ARM架构快杰云服务器宝塔安装时间:

UCloud上海机房ARM架构快杰云服务器配置(宝塔版):

UCloud上海机房ARM架构快杰云服务器宝塔跑分:

UCloud上海机房ARM架构快杰云服务器上传速度:

UCloud上海机房ARM架构快杰云服务器下载速度:

UCloud上海机房ARM架构快杰云服务器SuperBench脚本测试:

有些信息没测出来,可能和操作系统版本有关,以往测评的Centos 7.6正常。

----------------------------------------------------------------------
 Superbench.sh -- https://www.oldking.net/350.html
 Mode  : Standard    Version : 1.1.7
 Usage : wget -qO- sb.oldking.net | bash
----------------------------------------------------------------------
 CPU Model            : 
 CPU Cores            :  Cores  MHz aarch64
 CPU Cache            :  
 OS                   : CentOS 8.2.2004 (64 Bit) Dedicated
 Kernel               : 4.18.0-193.el8.aarch64
 Total Space          : 4.0 GB / 40.2 GB 
 Total RAM            : 409 MB / 919 MB (160 MB Buff)
 Total SWAP           : 48 MB / 1024 MB
 Uptime               : 0 days 0 hour 47 min
 Load Average         : 0.12, 1.41, 1.14
 TCP CC               : cubic
  File "tools.py", line 16
    print jjson[para.encode('utf-8')]
              ^
SyntaxError: invalid syntax
  File "tools.py", line 16
    print jjson[para.encode('utf-8')]
              ^
SyntaxError: invalid syntax
  File "tools.py", line 16
    print jjson[para.encode('utf-8')]
              ^
SyntaxError: invalid syntax
  File "tools.py", line 16
    print jjson[para.encode('utf-8')]
              ^
SyntaxError: invalid syntax
  File "tools.py", line 16
    print jjson[para.encode('utf-8')]
              ^
SyntaxError: invalid syntax
  File "tools.py", line 16
    print jjson[para.encode('utf-8')]
              ^
SyntaxError: invalid syntax
  File "tools.py", line 16
    print jjson[para.encode('utf-8')]
              ^
SyntaxError: invalid syntax
 ASN & ISP            : , 
 Organization         : 
 Location             : ,  / 
 Region               : 
----------------------------------------------------------------------
 I/O Speed( 1.0GB )   : 76.9 MB/s
 I/O Speed( 1.0GB )   : 77.2 MB/s
 I/O Speed( 1.0GB )   : 77.0 MB/s
 Average I/O Speed    : 77.0 MB/s
----------------------------------------------------------------------
 Node Name        Upload Speed      Download Speed      Latency     
 Speedtest.net    0.95 Mbit/s       47.87 Mbit/s        9.11 ms     
 Nanjing 5G   CT  0.96 Mbit/s       47.81 Mbit/s        7.83 ms     
 Hefei 5G     CT  0.97 Mbit/s       47.93 Mbit/s        10.32 ms    
 Guangzhou 5G CT  1.08 Mbit/s       48.43 Mbit/s        31.42 ms    
 TianJin 5G   CU  0.95 Mbit/s       49.45 Mbit/s        20.82 ms    
 Shanghai 5G  CU  0.92 Mbit/s       48.14 Mbit/s        1.86 ms     
 Wuxi 5G      CM  0.96 Mbit/s       48.38 Mbit/s        11.34 ms    
 Nanjing 5G   CM  1.01 Mbit/s       48.43 Mbit/s        10.60 ms    
 Hefei 5G     CM  0.94 Mbit/s       47.85 Mbit/s        12.67 ms    
----------------------------------------------------------------------
 Finished in  : 5 min 47 sec
 Timestamp    : 2021-12-26 23:28:58 GMT+8
 Results      : ./superbench.log
----------------------------------------------------------------------
 Share result:
 · https://www.speedtest.net/result/c/a174cf98-4d48-417c-9724-420afcae3747
 · https://paste.ubuntu.com/p/R9DKpDFYXf/
----------------------------------------------------------------------

UCloud上海机房ARM架构快杰云服务器UnixBench脚本测试:

这个测Linux云服务器综合性能的,UnixBench跑分大于1000,可以说明机器综合性能佳。

------------------------------------------------------------------------
Benchmark Run: Sun Dec 26 2021 23:38:53 - 00:06:41
0 CPUs in system; running 1 parallel copy of tests

Dhrystone 2 using register variables       44010025.1 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Double-Precision Whetstone                     8447.7 MWIPS (8.9 s, 7 samples)
Execl Throughput                               7689.5 lps   (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks       1094596.4 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks          303986.7 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks       3331328.6 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Pipe Throughput                             2001085.1 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Pipe-based Context Switching                 375708.6 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Process Creation                              14355.0 lps   (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent)                   8352.0 lpm   (60.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent)                   1104.6 lpm   (60.0 s, 2 samples)
System Call Overhead                        1970243.7 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)

System Benchmarks Index Values               BASELINE       RESULT    INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables         116700.0   44010025.1   3771.2
Double-Precision Whetstone                       55.0       8447.7   1536.0
Execl Throughput                                 43.0       7689.5   1788.3
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks          3960.0    1094596.4   2764.1
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks            1655.0     303986.7   1836.8
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks          5800.0    3331328.6   5743.7
Pipe Throughput                               12440.0    2001085.1   1608.6
Pipe-based Context Switching                   4000.0     375708.6    939.3
Process Creation                                126.0      14355.0   1139.3
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent)                     42.4       8352.0   1969.8
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent)                      6.0       1104.6   1841.0
System Call Overhead                          15000.0    1970243.7   1313.5
                                                                   ========
System Benchmarks Index Score                                        1917.9



======= Script description and score comparison completed! =======